翻訳と辞書 |
Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council : ウィキペディア英語版 | Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council
''Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council'' () (UKHL 5 ) is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil. ==Facts== A bridal clothing shop at 53-61 St George’s Road was compulsorily purchased by the Glasgow Corporation. The business in the shop was run by a company called Campbell Ltd. But the shop itself, though all on one floor, was composed of different units of property. Mr Solomon Woolfson owned three units and another company, Solfred Holdings Ltd owned the other two. Mr Woolfson had 999 shares in Campbell Ltd and his wife the other. They had twenty and ten shares respectively in Solfred Ltd. Mr Woolfson and Solfred Ltd claimed compensation together for loss of business after the compulsory purchase, arguing that this situation was analogous to the case of ''DHN v Tower Hamlets LBC''.〔''DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council'' () 1 WLR 852〕 The Land Tribunal denied it on the basis that Campbell Ltd was the sole occupier.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|